Comments on: Why Students Struggle in General Chemistry: Understanding Open-Ended Assessment in the Chemistry 111 Classroom /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/ Sat, 30 Apr 2022 01:33:29 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Abbi Tarburton /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-29383 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:54:22 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-29383 Dr. Feierabend, I think a huge opportunity is the increase in accessibility for students. A challenge would be that this assessment aligns more with standards-based grading which isn’t super common and requires an educator to be a little more hands-on/ adapt their teaching/ grading style.

Dr. Edmiston, I think anything that could be graded with standards (can they do mole conversions, do they know molecular structure and how electrons work, etc.) would work really well with CEs. Higher level thinking objectives (do they understand how this analysis technique could be used in water treatment, for example) are are little more difficult to asses with this technique and require a more direct prompt.

Dr. Martin, the prompt is designed to figure out what students know and think about when faced with certain concepts. It was scored exactly how the prompt was stated! Were there enough answers? Were they distinct? Were they correct? Sometimes when educators use this assessment they’ll say only one answer can be outside the scope of the course and that’s where the relevant comes in. This is beneficial in terms of accessibility and grading transparency because the way it’s scored is right in the description.

]]>
By: Sarah Sobeck /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-29319 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:21:59 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-29319 Thanks for sharing Abbi! I hope this has been a good experience for you and look forward to hearing about your future work in the classroom.

]]>
By: Sara Martin /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-29285 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:26:01 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-29285 Congratulations, Abbi! Open-ended assessment is certainly very different than the types of assessments that are typically used in chemistry classrooms. What is the significance behind asking students to name no more than 7 “correct, distinct, and relevant facts?” How did you score the responses?

]]>
By: Megan Zins /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-29178 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:43:27 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-29178 Hi Abbi! I love how your project navigates a unprecedented topic in combining education and chemistry! Well done!

]]>
By: Paul Edmiston /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-29170 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 16:34:35 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-29170 It is great to see the findings of your project, especially since I had the chance to follow along since Junior IS. Which topic in General Chemistry do you think lends itself best to open-ended-assessments?

]]>
By: Karl Feierabend /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-28989 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:38:06 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-28989 Thanks for sharing your poster, Abbi! Fascinating work. What do you see as the most significant opportunities and challenges for broader implementation of open-ended assessments in the classroom?

]]>
By: Jennifer Faust /2022/04/26/abigail-tarburton/#comment-28985 Fri, 29 Apr 2022 13:34:46 +0000 /?p=31815#comment-28985 It was a pleasure to serve as your second reader, Abbi! I don’t have any new questions because I’ve already asked them all. Best wishes for your continued work in CER at Miami University!

]]>